ince the recent government pact between the PP and PSOE in the Town Hall of Els Poblets, the Mayor Jaime Ivars (PP) evaluates the economic situation and is very satisfied by the present operation of the new team of government.
After meetings held with several groups within the town it has been possible to asses the degree of satisfaction expressed by the residents. A favourable reaction has been reported with regard to the situation on several subjects, for example, the situation of the gardens, works and services and cleaning, departments directed previously by Mr. Simarro of the PIREE.
As far as the present economic situation of the Town Hall of Els Poblets, the situation is not anything as dramatic as some want to make out.
It is clear that the situation is not absolutely buoyant but numbers do not deceive and for that reason, the Mayor affirms that he has kept his feet on the ground and has taken economic measure, such as the reduction of expenses and good management of income, which has given and will continue to bear fruit. At the close of accounts for 2009 already it has resulted in a positive budgetary result of approximately 235,000 € whereas in the previous exercise it was almost 500,000 € negative. The treasury surplus that was 600,000 € negative has gone to only 100,000 € negative, that is to say, an improvement of almost 500,000 €
All this data demonstrates the management previously and those that will be taken from now on by the new Treasury Councilwoman will be the best ones and most advantageous for the municipality. The Mayor thanked in advance the councilwoman for her dedication so that this work is continued and affirmed, "I am sure that we will make the treasury into a surplus with the new guidelines on savings and containment of costs taken by the new team of government.
Looking at the present Spanish economic situation and worldwide crisis, the Town Hall of Els Poblets is one of the best situated, data corroborated by several mass media studies that have appeared in the press.
Very pleasing was the surprise of the new partners when they entered into government alongside the PP when they were able to verify that the economic situation was fairly good, because in spite of what others declared, the Town Hall had a positive balance of almost 410,000 € (almost 70 million pesetas) in addition to having no debt with banking organisations.
It is necessary to remember that no matter how much the opposition insists on trying to make the residents of Els Poblets believe that the situation is dramatic and that it is bankrupt, nothing could be further from the truth.
Shortly we are going to undertake new works for the improvement of the town, pertaining to Plan-E of the Government and the plan Confianza of the Generalitat Valenciana, for example, the adjustment of the exit from Miralfor towards Vergel and the urbanization of the adjacent streets to Ave. Jaume 1. At the moment the improvements of the Las Marinas road, the pumping stations and the drainage network are being done. Also a new protective fence in Carrer Girona is being installed, painting of Casa de Cultura and the renovation of the old school, work, which besides improving the town, will enable it's use by people of the municipality.
The Government team is looking forward to continuing to work hard with the desire to make the best decisions in favour of the interests of the town and for the residents.
miércoles, 28 de abril de 2010
martes, 13 de abril de 2010
THE HYPOCRISY OF PIREE AND OTHERS
Hypocrisy may come from the desire to hide the real motives of others. Normally it manifests showing what you want (simulation), or hiding what you do not want to be seen (dissimulation).
PIREE simulated when it governed with the PP the necessity to put out to tender the concession of the water, in total agreement. During the process it hid from its partners its true intentions which were nothing more than taking personal and political benefit, proposing to the PP a decision to vote against any legal administrative procedure in public contracts.
Lacking the support of the PP they contacted the parties of the opposition with the sole purpose of ousting the PP Mayor from office and to obtain a positive vote from the opposition in favour of the 4th listed company for the water provision (which had less than 40 points than the 1st named)
Mr Simarro, you proposed the censure motion, but the other parties were not prepared to take on the office of mayor. Therefore, if somebody has to clarify something it is you (or your noxious company)
What made him change his vote to decide on the last company (more than 40 points less than the st) bypassing the legal administrative procedure?
It is paradoxical that always we find him in media related to water, not with the mud, which we know you don't like, but the water because it is used to make cheap political propoganda. Try to remember Mr Simarro the 12th October 2007 when, according to what is said by the people, the first thing you did was to make you and your vehicle safe and then with beer in hand, watch the water devastate the streets of the town. Clarify to the residents the transparent and coherent actions of which you boast in your writing. We do not see them anywhere. We were the ones who supported you, when your new friends wanted your head!
At a residents meeting you said that you and your group favoured the water concession. Why now in your writings, and after being the initiator of neighborhood distress caused by skipping the administrative procedure, support the last company (more than 40 points less than the first)? What is better than the 1st, 2nd and 3rd according to you and your group.
The Partido Popular has no preference for any company and we have always complied with the requirements of the legal process. What you should explain is why you have this commitment to the last company which made you skip the legal process!
You in your writing affirm to have demonstrated with documents and facts the coherence and transparency……..,to seek for and look after the most profitable things for the town……y bla, bla, bla. What draws attention powerfully is that it always has the word “profitable” in its content! - a little more tact in regard to such matters which relate to a town is to use the term “the best”. Do you truly believe that their amendments are the most profitable? Clarify in what! To us there is no doubt that they were the most prejudicial because having no remedy would have cost a lot of money for the town. But clearly you don't care about that!
We, the PP, govern with whomsoever defends the general interests and the best thing for the people, and considering the situation created by you and others it is the best thing that could have happened to the people. Or does he not remember that he went to make a pact with Mr. Caselles and the BLOC to extract an affirmative vote in favour of the fourth company? How is it that according to you, you want the best thing for the people and could not it obtain this support?
The only thing that bothers him is that both councilmen of the socialist group have reflected and have returned to the legal administrative procedure the contest of the concession of the water and have arrived at a pact of governability because we are convinced that it is the best thing for the town. It has been COMPOUNDED INFORMALLY. Explain to the voters of the PIREE how his attitude has benefited them! According to many people of this party it is said around town that they did not see clearly the manoeuvre that you tried with the topic of the water, since apparently it would be “profitable” only for his interests.
Before they governed and now no longer, although even better they will be paid for creating discomfort to the neighbourhood and circumventing legal administrative procedure.
Del Partido Popular de Els Poblets
PIREE simulated when it governed with the PP the necessity to put out to tender the concession of the water, in total agreement. During the process it hid from its partners its true intentions which were nothing more than taking personal and political benefit, proposing to the PP a decision to vote against any legal administrative procedure in public contracts.
Lacking the support of the PP they contacted the parties of the opposition with the sole purpose of ousting the PP Mayor from office and to obtain a positive vote from the opposition in favour of the 4th listed company for the water provision (which had less than 40 points than the 1st named)
Mr Simarro, you proposed the censure motion, but the other parties were not prepared to take on the office of mayor. Therefore, if somebody has to clarify something it is you (or your noxious company)
What made him change his vote to decide on the last company (more than 40 points less than the st) bypassing the legal administrative procedure?
It is paradoxical that always we find him in media related to water, not with the mud, which we know you don't like, but the water because it is used to make cheap political propoganda. Try to remember Mr Simarro the 12th October 2007 when, according to what is said by the people, the first thing you did was to make you and your vehicle safe and then with beer in hand, watch the water devastate the streets of the town. Clarify to the residents the transparent and coherent actions of which you boast in your writing. We do not see them anywhere. We were the ones who supported you, when your new friends wanted your head!
At a residents meeting you said that you and your group favoured the water concession. Why now in your writings, and after being the initiator of neighborhood distress caused by skipping the administrative procedure, support the last company (more than 40 points less than the first)? What is better than the 1st, 2nd and 3rd according to you and your group.
The Partido Popular has no preference for any company and we have always complied with the requirements of the legal process. What you should explain is why you have this commitment to the last company which made you skip the legal process!
You in your writing affirm to have demonstrated with documents and facts the coherence and transparency……..,to seek for and look after the most profitable things for the town……y bla, bla, bla. What draws attention powerfully is that it always has the word “profitable” in its content! - a little more tact in regard to such matters which relate to a town is to use the term “the best”. Do you truly believe that their amendments are the most profitable? Clarify in what! To us there is no doubt that they were the most prejudicial because having no remedy would have cost a lot of money for the town. But clearly you don't care about that!
We, the PP, govern with whomsoever defends the general interests and the best thing for the people, and considering the situation created by you and others it is the best thing that could have happened to the people. Or does he not remember that he went to make a pact with Mr. Caselles and the BLOC to extract an affirmative vote in favour of the fourth company? How is it that according to you, you want the best thing for the people and could not it obtain this support?
The only thing that bothers him is that both councilmen of the socialist group have reflected and have returned to the legal administrative procedure the contest of the concession of the water and have arrived at a pact of governability because we are convinced that it is the best thing for the town. It has been COMPOUNDED INFORMALLY. Explain to the voters of the PIREE how his attitude has benefited them! According to many people of this party it is said around town that they did not see clearly the manoeuvre that you tried with the topic of the water, since apparently it would be “profitable” only for his interests.
Before they governed and now no longer, although even better they will be paid for creating discomfort to the neighbourhood and circumventing legal administrative procedure.
Del Partido Popular de Els Poblets
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)
