Hypocrisy may come from the desire to hide the real motives of others. Normally it manifests showing what you want (simulation), or hiding what you do not want to be seen (dissimulation).
PIREE simulated when it governed with the PP the necessity to put out to tender the concession of the water, in total agreement. During the process it hid from its partners its true intentions which were nothing more than taking personal and political benefit, proposing to the PP a decision to vote against any legal administrative procedure in public contracts.
Lacking the support of the PP they contacted the parties of the opposition with the sole purpose of ousting the PP Mayor from office and to obtain a positive vote from the opposition in favour of the 4th listed company for the water provision (which had less than 40 points than the 1st named)
Mr Simarro, you proposed the censure motion, but the other parties were not prepared to take on the office of mayor. Therefore, if somebody has to clarify something it is you (or your noxious company)
What made him change his vote to decide on the last company (more than 40 points less than the st) bypassing the legal administrative procedure?
It is paradoxical that always we find him in media related to water, not with the mud, which we know you don't like, but the water because it is used to make cheap political propoganda. Try to remember Mr Simarro the 12th October 2007 when, according to what is said by the people, the first thing you did was to make you and your vehicle safe and then with beer in hand, watch the water devastate the streets of the town. Clarify to the residents the transparent and coherent actions of which you boast in your writing. We do not see them anywhere. We were the ones who supported you, when your new friends wanted your head!
At a residents meeting you said that you and your group favoured the water concession. Why now in your writings, and after being the initiator of neighborhood distress caused by skipping the administrative procedure, support the last company (more than 40 points less than the first)? What is better than the 1st, 2nd and 3rd according to you and your group.
The Partido Popular has no preference for any company and we have always complied with the requirements of the legal process. What you should explain is why you have this commitment to the last company which made you skip the legal process!
You in your writing affirm to have demonstrated with documents and facts the coherence and transparency……..,to seek for and look after the most profitable things for the town……y bla, bla, bla. What draws attention powerfully is that it always has the word “profitable” in its content! - a little more tact in regard to such matters which relate to a town is to use the term “the best”. Do you truly believe that their amendments are the most profitable? Clarify in what! To us there is no doubt that they were the most prejudicial because having no remedy would have cost a lot of money for the town. But clearly you don't care about that!
We, the PP, govern with whomsoever defends the general interests and the best thing for the people, and considering the situation created by you and others it is the best thing that could have happened to the people. Or does he not remember that he went to make a pact with Mr. Caselles and the BLOC to extract an affirmative vote in favour of the fourth company? How is it that according to you, you want the best thing for the people and could not it obtain this support?
The only thing that bothers him is that both councilmen of the socialist group have reflected and have returned to the legal administrative procedure the contest of the concession of the water and have arrived at a pact of governability because we are convinced that it is the best thing for the town. It has been COMPOUNDED INFORMALLY. Explain to the voters of the PIREE how his attitude has benefited them! According to many people of this party it is said around town that they did not see clearly the manoeuvre that you tried with the topic of the water, since apparently it would be “profitable” only for his interests.
Before they governed and now no longer, although even better they will be paid for creating discomfort to the neighbourhood and circumventing legal administrative procedure.
Del Partido Popular de Els Poblets
